Simplify and Reinforce Your Learning Management System

Simplify and Reinforce Your Learning Management System

Organizations that invest in a learning management system, or LMS, have a powerful tool at their disposal. These systems, like Moodle, are flexible and configurable. However, having a system that can be customized to meet a company’s needs comes with challenges. These systems require knowledgeable resources to maintain, secure, and enhance the application to get the most value from it.

moodleapplications_detail

Reinforce Your LMS with Plug-Ins

Moodle offers customization options through the use of plug-ins, adding functionality to both the administration of the systems and enhancing the user experience.

There are two types of plug-ins – third party and custom-built.

Third-party plug-ins are additions for Moodle that are commercially available. These commoditized additions add features and functionality that many organizations find useful. Some of the more popular third-party plug-ins are:

  • ELIS – this plug-ing provides, business intelligence, data mining, learning management, and content management capabilities and administrative functions
  • BLOCK_COURSE_MODULENAVIGATION – Acting like a table of contents, this plug-in shows the user a summary of the course with section names and a list of activities
  • BLOCK_CONFIGURABLE_REPORTS – This allows you to build customer reports
  • QUIZACCESS_REATTEMPTCHECKER – This module prevents students from re-taking a quiz that they have already passed
  • MOD_CERTIFICATE – This plug-in allows instructors to create custom certificates based on a number of criteria
  • MOD_QUESTIONNAIRE – Create custom surveys with this plug-in

 

Some plug-ins are a breeze to install. Others need some configuration and knowledge to ensure they do not disrupt the working of the existing system or open security holes in your system.

You may find, however, that there are no third-party plug-ins that meet your exact needs. With Moodle’s open model, custom-built plug-ins can be developed to create the exact functionality you need for your LMS instance.

Simplifying the Maintenance of Moodle

Applications need regular attention. Whether that maintenance is related to bugs, upgrades for new features, or security hotfixes, it’s critical to keep your system up to date.

Because of the customizable and open nature of Moodle, it is important that the application receive regular updates as they are released to prevent performance problems, bugs, and other issues.

As additional features are added through plug-ins and configuration, upgrades can be tricky. An incompatible plug-in can cause issues that take considerable time to track down and fix.

Bugs – whether the result of an upgrade or because of a newly found problem – can be challenging to find in a system like Moodle, because no two implementations look the same. Although having a system that can be customized to your exact specifications is desirable, identifying the exact source of a bug can be time consuming.

Upgrades and hotfixes are also important for when security issues are found. Regular upgrades increase performance and add new features, while both upgrades and hotfixes ensure your implementation runs securely and optimally.

Maintaining your Moddle application does not have to be so complicated. A simple monthly/quarterly maintenance package can ensure you keep your application secure, efficient, and up to date.

Streamlining Access to Moodle with Integrations

A benefit of modern technical architecture is the ability to connect multiple systems with different functions, allowing them to share data. For instance, you may want to share course access and performance data with an HR system to track who has completed required modules of a class, eliminating the need for HR to log into multiple systems to see the data.

Another common integration is single sign-on, or SSO. With SSO, Moodle users who have logins to other systems within the organization can access their courses by just logging into the system they normally use in the course of their day. Because this is an integration that involves the security of an organization’s account access, it should be developed with protection of the organization’s assets in mind.

Gaining the greatest value from your Moodle requires regular maintenance, while enhancing the system with plug-ins and integrations result in better user experience and a more secure implementation. Contact SunNet for a free consultation to find out how our Moodle experts can help you maintain and improve your system.

 

What would you like SunNet Solutions to build for your business?

Submit a request at the left hand side of this page to get started today.
Contact us if you have any questions.

Discover the Root Cause of High Failure Rate within Custom Software Development

Discover the Root Cause of High Failure Rate within Custom Software Development

On Oct. 1, 2013 Healthcare.gov first launched and promptly crashed two hours later. A mere 6 people nationwide enrolled in the health care plan that day. The final budget was an astounding $1.7B (initially estimated to cost $93.7M). Various media outlets and analysts attempted to provide reasons for the failure.

Per a Standish CHAOS report, a staggering 31.1% of projects will be cancelled before they are completed. Further results indicate 52.7% of projects will cost 189% of their original estimates. On the successful side, only 16.2% of software projects are completed on- time and on-budget. So what can we do to help our project be one of the 16.2 %?

How do we define a software’s success?

If a software lines up perfectly with each of the requirements and has been delivered on time and on budget, do we call it a success? Many would answer “yes”. What if a project satisfies all the requirements but it fails to receive the system users’ acceptance ? Can we still call the project a success? The answer is NO. A business invests money to not only create software but also to better support the business and its goals. As leaders within the business world, we define a software’s ultimate success as one which complements and enhances the business’s goals. A software’s ultimate success is dependent upon all relevant departments, IT, and non-IT personnel.

The obvious and the …not so obvious failures

Failing to achieve business goals, surpassing budgets, delays, and broken transition management are some of the main areas in which custom software generally fail. In addition, system security and the lack of expansion potential are also common issues many types of software fail to catch. These are all issues many of generally think of when we think of potential reason for project failure, however, there is also one bigger issue many people seem to overlook.

While it is software failure, the issue sometimes stems from a deeper issue. When analyzing many of these instances, the immature business process itself is often causing the problem. Business processes must be setup before it can be improved, matured, and stabilized over time. If the process is underdeveloped, designing a software to implement the immature process results in management of the wrong processes. After the implementation, the business may not receive the expected results. In this situation, people often mistake it for an issue within the software. As such, businesses must be able to simultaneously improve their business processes while updating the software to support the processes.

What are the root causes of these failures?

There are various causes of failure: poor delegation, wrong decision-making, faulty plans, failure to resolve conflicts between team members, inefficient communication, resistance to new procedures, user-unfriendly system, inappropriate transition management, etc. These issues result from not following adequate project management processes.

Surprisingly, many projects fail due to wrong delegation of key personnel. One of the root causes of Healthcare.gov’s failure was the poor choice in project leadership.

Problems within an organization’s culture can also lead to a project’s failure, especially within government projects. Team-oriented mindsets are extremely critical to any project’s success. Many teams, fearing confrontation, fail to address issues outright, allowing problems to continue. A high-trust, accepting environment, and efficient team is crucial for the success of a complex software project.

As a thought leader, what is the check list to establish a successful foundation?

1. Do we have a project committee? Does it have the right people in it?

2. What type of culture and mindset does our project committee have?

3. What process must we follow to make decisions including the software’s role in the business?

4. Is our software project plan executable, measurable, and adjustable when needed?

5. Do we have the right talent and how do we delegate resources?

6. How will the project manager manage communication, progress, risks, experiment costs, buy-in from task holders, and the system’s final users?

The People Have Spoken-House Bill 2982

The People Have Spoken-House Bill 2982

House Bill 2982 – Gathering Pipelines

On July 23rd SunNet attended the Railroad Commission of Texas, Pipeline Safety Division’s Workshop concerning House Bill 2982 (HB 2982) held in Rockport, Texas. The Workshop consisted primarily of a presentation given by Polly McDaniel, Pipeline Safety Division’s Director with a follow-up of questions and answers. The following is our brief take-away from that session, and how we may be able to help those operators who will be involved by its implementation on September, 2015.

It Seems the People Have Spoken

The general public looks to the State and local governing bodies of elected officials for resolutions to many issues that require widespread and general considerations that can best be handled by a governing body. One of the things they expect to be taken care of by their governments is the safe operation and maintenance of pipelines that run through their properties, and their neighborhoods. Since it would be difficult for an individual and a pipeline operator to resolve all issues between them (there are sometimes quite a few individuals with issues), it is expected by the general public that the State officials should develop, pass laws and establish regulations to resolve or lessen any severity of these issues. When some of the general public realized that not all pipelines operating in the State of Texas were regulated, especially those operating in sensitive areas that would raise concern for public safety should a leak occur, they looked to their elected officials to address this issue and do something about it. Thus the development and passing of House Bill 2982 in 2013.

What Does HB 2982 Consist Of?

HB 2982 is basically an add-on of the Texas Natural Resources Code. It adds new language to Chapter 117, which pertains to hazardous liquids and carbon dioxide pipelines as follows:

117,012(a) – Rules adopted under this subsection that apply to the intrastate transportation of hazardous liquids and carbon dioxide by gathering pipelines in rural locations and intrastate hazardous liquid and carbon dioxide gathering pipeline facilities in rural locations must be based only on the risks the transportation and the facilities present to the public safety, except that the commission shall revise the rules as necessary to comply with Subsection (c) and to maintain the maximum degree of federal delegation permissible under 49 U.S.C. Section 6010, or a succeeding law if the federal government adopts rules that include safety standards applicable to the transportation and facilities.

For gas gathering pipelines, HB 2982 adds to the Texas Utilities Code, Chapter 121 a new paragraph (8) to Section 121.201(a) as follows:

… (8) by rule establish safety standards and practices for gathering facilities and transportation activities in Class 1 locations, as defined by 49 C.F.R. Section 192.5:

(A) Based only on the risks the facilities and activities present to the public safety, to the extent consistent with federal law; or

(B) As necessary to maintain the maximum degree of federal delegation permissible under 49 U.S.C. Section 60101, or a succeeding law, if the federal government adopts safety standards and practices for gathering facilities and transportation activities in Class 1 locations, as defined by 49 C.F.R. Section 192.5.

Simply put:this rule concerns only gathering pipelines and their associated facilities (meters, separators, glycol units, etc.) located in rural areas. The rule does not make any attempt to further define a gathering pipeline or imply any definitive point where a flow line ends and a gathering line begins. It does however, state that a gathering pipeline in a Class 1 location or a rural area will now be regulated on the basis of any risks posed to public safety.

Between now and September 2015 the Commission can, and most likely will require operators to provide information to the Commission that would be necessary in determining various levels of risks presented to the public safety by the transportation of gas, hazardous liquids and carbon dioxide by means of these gathering pipelines and their associated facilities in Class 1 locations and rural areas. At a minimum, the following data would be great importance:

  • Total miles of gathering pipelines (per system) consisting of carbon steel, plastic or other line pipe material – list the mileage of each.
  • Line pipe specifics (wall thickness, pipe stress yield, date of installation, etc.)
  • Maximum operating pressure (MOP, MAOP)
  • Current flow rate
  • Current operating pressure
  • Operating permit, or T-4 number
  • What determination is currently being used for regulatory status?
  • Are leak surveys of any kind conducted?
  • Is the system in question under cathodic protection?
  • Is the system in question have surveillance?
  • Is internal corrosion considered?
  • Is atmospheric corrosion monitored on a regular basis?
  • Has the structural integrity of the system been assessed, and what methodology was used?
  • Does the system in question have a valid pressure test record?
  • Does the system have an over pressure protection device in place?
  • Does the system have ample line markers?
  • Are the gas pipelines odorized?
  • Is the system under any damage prevention program?
  • Is the system currently under a written emergency plan?
  • Is the system part of a public awareness program?
  • Number of the following are within ½ mile of the pipeline system:

    • Dwellings
    • Public or private schools
    • Care facilities
    • Recreational areas
    • Retail or commercial areas
    • Religious gatherings
    • Airport
    • Agricultural related structures
    • Prison
  • For the gathering pipeline systems in question, how many of the following results per year have occurred in the past 5 years:

    • Incidents
    • Fatalities
    • Injuries
    • Estimated Costs
    • Number caused by excavation

Further Considerations Concerning HB 2982

Generally the operators of these pipelines to be covered by HB 2982 have not been expected to submit a plan to remediate an abnormal operation, incident, integrity threat or complaint, but may be asked to do so by the Commission under this ruling. Also as a result of this ruling the Commission could require the operators to provide information further to the bulleted items mentioned previously that may be necessary to determine the risks presented to the public safety by the transported gas, hazardous liquids and carbon dioxide through these pipelines in Class 1 locations and rural areas.

All and all, it looks like gas gathering pipelines in Class 1 locations and liquid gathering pipelines in rural areas are now going to be regulated to some extent, and this could be expense for some operators who have not maintained historical data for these pipelines very well for various reasons in the past. Another year remains before HB 2982 develops any muscle or specifics, so now would be a very good time to assist the Commission in further developing the rule and regulatory requirements. To her credit, Mrs. Polly McDonald’s discussion seemed to be centered on this theme of getting input from the very operators who will be affected by this House Bill. Not only is information needed to help the Commission establish a risk-ranking process to determine which segments will receive the most attention of the regulatory considerations this bill will have, but now may also be a good time for the operators to help develop a more conclusive definition of what a jurisdictional gathering pipeline actually is, and where that jurisdiction begins and ends.

The previously noted bulleted items represent an awful lot of data. If an operator had not already compiled at least this data mentioned, it would be a shame to collect it now for just this this one occasion. SunNet offers a solution that will not only help compile this data for you, but will store it in an informative and meaningful way for future use. Or maybe you already have this data, but in several formats (handwritten, photos, PDF, drawings, etc.) or different databases. SunNet could still be of great assistance in bringing it all together while providing a quick and simple means for managing it as well.

September 2015 is just around the corner. Contact SunNet today and speak to one of our Data Management and Pipeline Compliance experts.

Let’s get some feedback: Let us know if you find this helpful. Email us and feel free to tell us if we have a misconception, or maybe we have not spent enough time on a particular subject that you feel more needs to be said. We have thick skins, can’t hurt our feeling – it is more important to us that we have not mislead anyone. If you do wish to comment, let us know if you do not wish to have your emails or comments posted, and we’ll just keep it between us.

By Randy Vaughn, SunNet’s Pipeline Database Management Solutions Advisor

What would you like SunNet Solutions to build for your business?

Submit a request at the left hand side of this page to get started today.
Contact us if you have any questions.

Computer Systems and Databases Facilitate Pipeline IMP and Risk Management

Computer Systems and Databases Facilitate Pipeline IMP and Risk Management

Introduction

Corrosion personnel were probably one of the first groups, if not the first in the maintenance crews to develop and use databases to compile data collected during their field surveys. They would use these databases to later analyze, and make several determinations; from checking the current protection status of their systems, forecasting future needs, and even to demonstrate why improvements may be needed, and later use them to assist in developing annual budgets, upgrades or repair estimates.

These databases were great at providing information and data at a moment’s need, simply by querying the particular information within the database. These databases were generally only accessed and used by the corrosion department, but could later be reviewed by others as well, but only as read-only files. Of course, only the corrosion personnel would have read and write privileges.

Computer History – 101

It was not too many decades ago when a whole room would be designed and dedicated to just one computer system. These earlier computer systems required a lot of room and actually needed a cooling system that would prevent the computers from overheating. Now the same capabilities of these earlier computers are provided in computers that are hand-held, and can do much more than their early predecessors. It seems there is at least one computer involved in almost all we do today, and in some cases through initial design, computers are actually needed. For example, should an aircraft’s computer fail, in some of the latest models, it would be very difficult, probably even impossible to the pilot.

Today computers have made such pipeline processes as engineering, design, operations and even maintenance much quicker and much more efficient. The computer’s first real in-roads to the pipeline industry came as a need in both engineering and design, but today some pipeline systems are controlled, monitored and operated, for the most part by computers. It is safe to say, and a lot of people would agree that most of what we do today so effortlessly, may have been very difficult to achieve before the inroads of the computers.

Computer Uses Today

Let us briefly consider some of the needs of the computer today within the pipeline industry that were not even considered in pipeline industry’s early history. The computational pipeline monitoring (CPM) systems, for example can be found in use today in almost all pipeline systems in some aspect or another. Some of the earlier CPM systems seem simple by today’s standards, but they were basically designed and installed to better detect and alarm the operators of leaks, should any occur, allowing them to more quickly get the situation or incident under control. These systems were earlier designed to do little more than monitor the pipeline’s input and output pressure, temperature and flow rates; in some cases, should it detect any difference, it would alarm the operator to its detection, but these have since gotten much more sophisticated and now play a much bigger role in the scheme of things.

Probably developed because of the CPM, or perhaps nothing more than just a natural progression of things, the pipeline owners and operators have raised the bar, or up the ante as it were, by installing supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) systems. Today with the ever-developing use of the computer, several pipeline systems can virtually be monitored and control from one central remote location. And of course, as the computers become more lean and productive, so do the peripherals and programming needs.

As computer systems and their needs have grown, so has their uses. By doing what is expected of various computer systems, and their programing, a lot of data is acquired and stored. Early on, the primary reason for this data collection and storage was merely due to the fact that the SCADA system needed it to make certain decisions, react automatically to alarms or to maintain control within the pipeline’s designed parameters. The pipeline industry also quickly realized that the data collected and stored by the computers could be very useful in answering various questions that may arise from a specific period of time during the pipeline’s past operation, such as during an emergency, or during an abnormal operating situations. It now has become a normal mode of operation to query a system’s database from time-to-time to answer many questions, or maybe just to simply satisfy one’s own curiosity as to how well a recent alteration to the pipeline system is performing.

Database Access

The pipeline industry is in a mode of sorts, now where there exists for each pipeline system several different computer systems and programs, all managing their independent areas of concern and having their own separate databases. As the needs change through design and/or regulations we have become more aware of the need and conveniences of accessing all these databases to accommodate the many changes in operations, design and other facets of owning a pipeline. In the past, when fewer programs were used, it had not been too much of a problem to have a separate database for each program, because of information, whenever needed, one would just go to that particular program, access whatever the database had available, and go on to the next database if more information were thought to be needed, and hoped to be available. It is quickly becoming the norm that more than one database access for information is needed to satisfy a particular issue or situation. Because the databases were originally designed to merely satisfy a particular program’s needs, sometimes not all data retrieved from multiple databases seems to merge well together in a real meaningful manner. This is where a program such as SunNet Solution’s MyDat@IQTM begins its introduction into the history of computers and computer programming.

Sunnet Solution’s MyDat@IQTM

SunNet Solutions is a web application development and information technology (IT) provider with over 17 years of commitment to serving their clients with IT solutions. They provide a full range of services in the areas of software development, enterprise software solutions, database application and web portal development. From small businesses to large corporations, they provide affordable IT solutions that will maximize efficiency and increase profit through optimum web-based applications.

MyDat@IQTM database manager is just one of many programs SunNet Solutions has to offer. It is a multifaceted and unique database manager that begins as a standalone foundation program that can be customized and integrated with, to meet any customer’s data management needs, and although it is not the only database management program available, it is certainly thought to be one of a kind.

Even though its programming core begins as what appears to be just another database management program, MyDat@IQTM does much more than just store and retrieve data. MyDat@IQTM not only remembers where it had put everything, but also remembers how to quickly retrieve it. This program is designed to manage multiple databases, while leaving them, and their data content intact and unchanged. MyDat@IQTM can copy and merge all, or some information of all databases together into one main database if needed. MyDat@IQTM will help in making almost all decisions, and will even offer up suggested options with possible end results for resolving many questions and requirements that come with managing such a large ongoing program as an IMP, for example.

Through programing, this database management program can be built to accept any, and all forms of data; handwritten, photographs, drawings, quantitative values, etc. MyDat@IQTM has the ability to not only access and retrieve data from other databases, it can also be programed to evaluate the data as it receives it, and ensures that it understands all it needs to know, in order to store it properly (again, through its initial programming), and will even check against all other similar data that already exists – no matter where that data is located.

If while data is being entered appears to be a duplication that already exists in another form, or does not merge well with what is already available, MyDat@IQTM will prompt the computer program operator to check it, and make any necessary alterations to ensure the data is good, and is stored properly. And as it should be, for historical purposes, this database manager will not over-write any data.

The Many Uses Of MyDat@IQTM

Most of this discussion will be centered on an integrity management program (IMP), and how well MyDat@IQTM assists in improving the performance of any IMP and its end results. However, MyDat@IQTM has much more to offer in other areas such as project management, operator qualification, public awareness, accounting, and etc.

Most pipeline operators’ IMP, just in their nature, have become massive database user, and really should be. As we all know one requirement for a good IMP to perform properly, with good results, is having all available information quickly within an operator’s reach. The IMP regulations have been in place now for many years, and because of this, the pipeline operator has amassed tons of data and employs many different databases full of good and useful data. Within these pre-existing databases, there lies some very valuable and much needed information. Some of this data has probably been available for years and probably forgotten, but just the same, provides very important information for so many processes within the IMP that are needed and required. Any good IMP needs to be ever-aware of all historical data, no matter how insignificant it may seem at the time it was first entered, and should be data considered during all phases, or implementation of the many IMP processes. As is the nature of program databases, all data collected and stored, no matter the collection process or format used, is associated with a particular pipeline system, or a segment within a pipeline system. MyDat@IQTM can be programmed to understand these and many more associations by knowing just where to find data when needed – again, no matter how insignificant that data may have seemed initially. This database manager does not discriminate when considering available data, if data is available for whatever reason; MyDat@IQTM will bring it to the forefront offering it up as a possible consideration, no matter if any IMP process being implemented.

IMP Management

For the benefit of this IMP management discussion we will use a mock project call the “Recoat Project” performed sometime in the past. Let’s say this project took place some 14 years earlier on a 30-year-old pipeline system. We will use this mock project, and its data as a single maintenance incident that we will carry throughout various examples of how MyDat@IQTM works, in an effort to explain and highlight the many program features, expectations and uses. Also, in doing this it is hoped that the reader will better understand how important one item from some otherwise seemingly obscured historical data can be used over, and over again as a very useful means for something as involved and massive as a good IMP, and give some insight into how MyDat@IQTM actually works, while also highlighting some of the features that it has to offer.

A good example of how MyDat@IQTM will work within many aspects of operating a pipeline, just by being always available, and waiting for the go-ahead to run. Let’s take the following common example, MyDat@IQTM has in its database (in this case, available from a historical maintenance record) records of a 1,500 feet segment of pipeline recoated, and within another database it is noted that its cathodic protection (CP) system’s protective current output reduced as a probable result, at the same time. A good maintenance record, but not thought of since was developed of the Recoat Project and served as a very good piece of historical data to have for various reasons at the time it was recorded, and now while trying to determine threats for this pipeline during an IMP risk analysis process, it becomes even more important and becomes a consideration to MyDat@IQTM rather than just a maintenance record. MyDat@IQTM is aware that this information is available, because that is its basic nature to always consider all available during any process it is asked to perform.

It is the job of MyDat@IQTM through its programming to be aware of this data through its continued awareness and recognition that a lot of good information exists from many records for various reasons. One of the items that MyDat@IQTM considers and would find noteworthy and possibly important as future reference, is the Recoat Project did not include any pipe replacement or repairs since the external wall loss was found to be minor, leaving more than enough wall thickness to continue operating the pipeline safely. But again, the wall loss did cover a large area as general corrosion, so the Recoat Project was quite an undertaking. It was also noted in this particular maintenance report that the root-cause was poor coating leaving too much of the pipe’s exterior exposed to corrosive elements, and no other threat contribution was noted. The CP system was in play, but was being operated at a level that if left uncorrected may have later caused more serious corrosion problems with all of the pipeline’s coating system failing in that general area. Before the coating repair the CP maintenance records also indicate that even with the CP system’s protective current at an elevated level, the pipe-to-soil potential readings were not what was required to fully protect the pipeline. When completed the Recoat Project was a success, in that the CP system’s protective current could be reduced after follow-up investigations were performed. All of the good work and good record keeping was probably initially recorded for prosperity, and thought to be nothing more than simply a matter of historical information. Now some 14 years later MyDat@IQTM has access to this information and will use it as consideration for as many processes it is programed to initiate.

Risk Analysis

Without being asked MyDat@IQTM will always be aware these records exist, and will bring them and others like them to the forefront for consideration, no matter what task or process is being performed. Once the risk analysis program is made aware of these records, including relative details that MyDat@IQTM has extracted, the risk analysis results will be much more exact; a threat that may have gone unnoticed is now elevated to its proper level of consideration. After all, if a pipeline coating has already failed in one area, one should consider the possibility that failure could exist elsewhere, and should be thought of as a valid mechanical integrity threat. MyDat@IQTM will make this, possibly forgotten information relevant.

Integrity Assessment Method and Remediation

The Recoat Project again comes into play while trying to determine an integrity assessment method and making determination for all possible remediation considerations. Thanks largely to the work of MyDat@IQTM during the risk analysis process; we now know external corrosion, due to coating deterioration is a real threat consideration, especially making the coating suspect elsewhere. Because of a history of wall loss due to poor coating, the decision is made to use an inline inspection (ILI) tool as the method for integrity assessment. As the results of the tool run are analyzed the data is then imported by MyDat@IQTM into its database for storage, retrieval and further analysis. While MyDat@IQTM considers the anomalies, and begins to prepare the dig sheets for remediation as required by the appropriate regulations. It should be noted that MyDat@IQTM is aware of where the high consequence areas (HCA) are and uses this to correctly prioritize the digs and repairs. To continue with our Recoat Project example, let’s say there are a total of 550 anomalies in need of attention, and are grouped in 27 general areas, with only 15 of these found within HCA. MyDat@IQTM has not forgotten about the historical Recoat Project record, and realizes that 5 of the areas noted, because of their location are called out as areas of concern and are included as anomalies in need of repair. This recognition is added to its report, and suggests that these may have already been taken care of some 14 years earlier by the Recoat Project – remember no repairs or pipe replacement had occurred to restore any wall loss, so these could be the very same anomalies found at that earlier time. As it turns out the Recoat Project’s new coating was still in very good shape as verified by a few pipeline exposures, and the wall loss depths that were called out by the ILI tool were, indeed preexisting, and with that bit of information, more time and effort would be better spent on the remaining 10 areas, of which were really of lesser consequence in this particular case.

Preventative and Mitigative Measures (P&MM)

Remediation is complete and a reassessment of risk is performed. The overall risk value for the pipeline system has been reduced, and because not all of the existing coating was replaced of course, it is now time to use MyDat@IQTM to determine any P&MM that may be appropriate to reduce the risk value even more. By accessing information from its database and any others available to it, MyDat@IQTM is able to offer up possible P&MM that are available, and will even offer an opportunity to provide possible effects each proposed measure would have on the risk value should they be chosen to implement. If it has in its programming, and has access to necessary financial information, it can also provide an estimate for cost and any risk reduction realized for any possible P&MM considered. After the P&MM are implemented, MyDat@IQTM will simply ask if a risk analysis is wanted, or based on its programing, would just provide the current risk value and can also provide new threat prioritization, as well.

Program Self Evaluation

Because MyDat@IQTM has all that is needed to perform, or implement a very large and demonstrative IMP, it also has every capability and available data for evaluating how well all processes have performed, and produce records and demonstrations in any format a pipeline operator could think of to prove or show ongoing progress and any cost savings. And if IMP personnel are at a moment’s loss for a demonstration, MyDat@IQTM can, of course offer up suggestions – at this point would you expect less?

Today’s computers have become great tools for doing almost everything, and in using the best available programs just make the computers even better tools, and even more of a necessity. Hopefully this writing has given some insight into how all of this is possible. The many capabilities of MyDat@IQTM have only been touched-on here for introduction purposes, with the surface scratched only, but it is hoped this has instilled enough interest and consideration to promote the use of this innovative and very powerful database management program.

Submit a request at the left hand side of this page to get started today.
Contact us if you have any questions.

Better Results with myDataIQ

Better Results with myDataIQ

An Off-The-Cuff Discussion with Your Supervisor

Its Monday, and what a weekend! You ended up flying back home from one of your projects on Saturday afternoon. You could not catch a flight back home Friday night (your Friday off – by the way), because you could not get finished with all you needed to, until it was too late to even catch the last flight out. Oh, well it’s not the first time that’s happened; just part of the job.

First things, first; before you delve into anything right off-the-bat that would require more brain power than you have at the moment, you also realize that before you can kick-start your week, you are going to need some coffee. You get to the break room and the coffee pot is already empty.Why can’t people start a new pot of coffee after they empty the pot? While you’re waiting for the coffee to brew, your supervisor enters the break room. It seems you and he are on the same schedule this fine Monday morning. After some polite small talk; seeing you reminds him of a meeting he has later. He mentions that he needs to attend a staff meeting later this morning with the upper echelon to discuss projects of those in his group, and their current status. He says his meeting is not until 10 this morning (it’s already 7:30 but he thinks that should be time enough for me to put together some “updated info” on how my projects are going. Dang-nab-it!

All of a sudden, after a few sips of coffee, recent issues begin to visually run through your tired brain. By “recent”, this means; just late last week. You really have not had time to bare-down on any numbers yet. So much for “gradually easing” into a new work week.

better-results-mydataiq-2

Back at your desk, you begin to gather your thoughts and try to figure some means of pulling this all together. A couple of things you know for sure are the little design glitches that surfaced while the contractor was trying to fit-up some manifold piping, and the fact that the valves are a week late of the forecasted delivery, and still nowhere to be seen. These are both going to cost you some “extras” with your construction contractor, but you are not sure yet just how much. You are already behind schedule, and even though the valve supplier says the deliveries are “any day now”, this really does not help much. You are aware of the secret project grapevine system (you still do not understand how it works), and because of this mysterious system, you know everyone in the office is probably already well aware of these issues, and some may have even expanded their importance a little bit. So you know you need to address these in your little impromptu report this morning. I’m betting someone in that staff meeting will know about these issues, and my supervisor needs to be well informed.

Don’t you hate those little workspace cubicles? No doors to shut while you are trying to concentrate. It seems a lot of things went on last week in your absence, and it seems several coworkers feel a need to fill you in on all of it. Some of the gossip seems very interesting, and you would love to listen in on it, but you really need to pull yourself away, and continue to get that report put together for your supervisor. The phones (both the desk and cell) just keep ringing while your computer chirps away with email arrivals. … Who did they say got promoted to a director’s position? Your brain really wants to brake all this down so you can figure out how you fit-in, since this promotion will no doubt also affect you somehow, – maybe even a possible promotion for you too! Aw, never mind. Got to get back at it!

Just now someone comes by your “cube” and comments that he heard you were at the mercy of the contractor because of some design issues. While following up with the statement that I need to “grab my wallet and hold on, I understand it’s going to cost you a bundle” – I can only wonder how that secret project grapevine system works – amazing! I need to get some more coffee.

Does the above episode bring to mind any Mondays you may have had in your past? It’s typical of a few I’ve had. Thank goodness today we have computers and software programs that are probably much faster than the secret project grapevine system. As a good example, SunNet Solutions TM offers a new web base database management software called MyDat@IQ TM that never sleeps. It’s always there looking for data to manage. When data is entered by someone, or from another program (i.e. SCADA, updates to historical data, changes to the O&M procedures, etc.) anywhere and in any format; this database manager will be aware of it, and actually understand its relevance and what it represents through its initial customized programing.

Again, consider the above Monday episode and try to envision how using this database manager might have made things a little different.

During the initial conversation with your supervisor, imagine how nice it would have been to tell him you needed just a few minutes to put something together, and you would visit with him to go over it, and even provide him with some reports to take with him to the staff meeting.

So now you are saying “how is that possible at 7:30 on a Monday morning, after being out of the office all of the previous week (including most of Saturday)”.

To begin with, this database management software does not sleep (it’s on the web), and when data is entered somewhere (even through a phone app), it knows about it. It has the weekly and daily work reports that were entered by all your inspectors just this past Friday – once you finally left. It even has your travel expenses you updated this past Saturday night. It’s actually sitting there waiting to see if you would like to finalize your expense statement and send it out.

It has access to all historical data, including actual costs from past, paid and pending invoices, and it also remembers that you have a penalty clause in the purchase order issued to the valve vendors should they miss a delivery date. It can give you man-hours and costs based on past invoices for similar work, and of course this information will be offered up for any editing you might need to do, and actually give you an idea of how much you should expect to pay your contractor for any “extras” – Ha! No need to grab your wallet. And now that you know that you have penalties stated in your valve purchase orders, you may have already covered any “extra” costs for your contractor’s down time. You might want to pass this information along to your valve vendors. Who knows, you may have your valves delivered pretty quickly.

Oops, while you are doing enquiries to MyDat@IQ TM you are alerted to the fact that a couple of past invoices from your contractor were actually for too much money according to the specifics in the contract and the weld-count of your welding inspector. Well, my, my, my, who owes who money now? They may need to grab their wallet.

Let’s just overwhelm everyone at the upper-echelon staff meeting by printing out and providing your supervisor with your up to the minute reports. Go ahead and give them the charts that show how well the projects estimated costs, committed expenses and actual expenditures are all tracking so very nicely. Yeah, and go ahead; give them the most updated forecast for completion while you’re at it. And while you’re on a roll, go ahead and give them all this data all broken down to mind bogglingly miniscule items and segments – no problem, and so accurate too!

Now, after just a few minutes conferring with the software, take everything to your supervisor and spend a few minutes bringing him up to date. And look its only 8:30, and your supervisor is loaded for bear. Ok, take a little break now, and start your own rumors and gossip. Tell everyone the talk on the street is that you may be looking at a promotion soon, but be coy about it.

Ok, break over, and back to MyDat@IQ TM and on to one of your other projects; the IMP status of the El Paso to Houston, Texas 12” Pipeline system, or whatever system. You should have this done in time for lunch when you and your supervisor plan to discuss how the staff meeting went. Does anyone sense a sequel here?

By Randy Vaughn, SunNet’s Pipeline Database Management Solutions Advisor

 

What would you like SunNet Solutions to build for your business?

Submit a request at the left hand side of this page to get started today.
Contact us if you have any questions.